BARD'S EYE VIEW: Her Majesty the Queen Gets Overruled by New York City's Finest; Don't Get Bitten by 'Rogue'
by Shrykespeare
Hello once again, and welcome to yet another edition of Bard's Eye View, where I, your champion of cinematic prognostication, swoop down from the ether to rescue you from the bug-eyed monster that we call ignorance. Whether you are a time-stopping, teleporting Japanese comic-and-sci-fi geek (armed with a samurai sword and a plucky attitude), or whether you are a precocious 16-year-old cheerleader (who apparently needs "saving" despite a complete invulnerability to injury), I bid you welcome. (Yes, yes, yes, this week it's Heroes. What can I say? Ever since I first heard about this show, I've been putty in Tim Kring's hands. Or Masi Oka's. Or, God willing, Ali Larter's. Wink.)
The weekend of Oct. 12 will bring the usual mixed bag of releases: a historical drama, a crime drama, an adult comedy-drama, an uplifting sports story and a horror movie featuring an abnormally large member of the animal kingdom. On the surface, most of these films look eminently watchable (see if you can guess which one doesn't), but only a couple have an above-average chance of making your roster look better. There's a lot of ground to cover, so let's not dally.
In 1998, Elizabeth racked up seven Academy Award nominations, including Best Picture, Best Actress, Best Cinematography and Best Costume Design (only one win, though, for Best Makeup). Considering the genre and its "chick flick" label, it still made an impressive $30 million in revenues, over a six-month period. Now Cate Blanchett attempts to both relive and repeat history with Elizabeth: The Golden Age, a film that will probably not be able to clear the (very high) bar set by its predecessor.
Apart from Cate, the inestimable Geoffrey Rush also returns, as well as director Shekhar Kapur and writer Michael Hirst, which you would expect to mean that we'd get an even better product this time around. And adding Clive Owen to the mix should only help, right? Well, the current IMDb User Rating for this film, a staggering 8.9, would seem to bear that out. But don't get stars in your eyes, folks ... early reviews of this film seem to indicate that it's all sizzle and no steak.
Emmanuel Levy calls this film "overbaked and shallow, with anachronistic and often embarrassing dialogue." Todd McCarthy of Variety says it "lacks any sense of occasion relative to the pageant it attempts to depict." Even the positive reviews, most of which laud the way the film was shot and acted, say that Golden Age is "a cliché-filled period film that carries very little weight or emotional impact" (Edward Douglas of ComingSoon.net). Yowch.
From what I've heard, Cate is far more likely to receive an Academy Award nomination for her stark portrayal of Bob Dylan in the upcoming I'm Not There than for this. Yes, the Academy may choose to nominate her twice, but I seriously doubt it. To put it mildly, I think Fantasy Moguls's estimate that this film will make $41 million is greatly overblown. Five PTA points and three Top 5 points are also predicted; depending on its release size, one of these two prognostications may come true, but certainly not both. If you're thinking about spending $15 on this film for your Box Office league, I think you'd do better to throw in a couple of extra bucks for Saw IV or Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium. And as for the $24 you'd shell out for Liz in Ultimate, I think there are much better choices, such as Rendition or Darfur Now.
Depending on its ad campaign (which has already started), I much prefer the chances of We Own the Night to top its predicted Moguls stats. For one thing, you've got two lead actors coming off of highly-acclaimed, Oscar-nominated performances: Joaquin Phoenix for Walk the Line, and Mark Wahlberg for The Departed. They are joined by Robert Duvall, a previous Oscar winner who is still greatly respected and trying to erase the stench left by Lucky You.
Duvall, who plays the patriarch of the family, is a decorated policeman who no doubt encouraged his sons to follow in his footsteps; while son Joseph (Wahlberg) did indeed join the NYPD, son Bobby (Phoenix) instead chose to turn his back on his family and became the manager of a nightclub/disco, with occasional forays into illegal territories ... not surprising, given that the owner is a Russian Mafioso. You can probably guess how it plays out from there. Bobby is forced to choose between his wealth/lifestyle/job and his family when the two worlds collide, with very severe consequences. From the reviews I've read, the acting talent present is more than adequate to carry the film, and it should be more than enough to give Night a decent showing at the ticket counters. Unfortunately, that seems to be all this film has going for it, as the plot and execution of the script have taken some harsh hits in those same reviews.
Heartbreak Kid is almost sure to repeat as the box office champ for a second straight weekend Oct. 12-14, and it's anybody's guess what will end up at No. 2 ... but I'd give Night the edge over Elizabeth due to its broader fan base. It's predicted to get no PTA points, only one Top 5 point, and an IMDb number of 7.2. I actually think that it could produce as many as seven Top 5 points, and probably no fewer than three. For similarly-priced Ultimate fare, I'd say it's either this or Dan in Real Life, which is much more of a PTA threat. As for Box Office ($7), you could go with 30 Days of Night, Gone Baby Gone or The Dark Is Rising for virtually the same amount of money, so take your pick as to which one will bring you the most green. (Hint: Eskimo vampires.)
An interesting conundrum ... Tyler Perry's plays have, for the most part, been hits. His movies, near as I can figure, have been successes, if modest ones. His current TV show, House of Payne, is getting very reasonable ratings. And his latest outing in theaters, Tyler Perry's Why Did I Get Married?, seems poised to follow his pattern of quality adult-themed films. So, why, oh why, are people so quick to put him down?
I mean, his last two releases, Madea's Family Reunion (which made $63 million in early 2006) and Daddy's Little Girls (which made $31 million in the early part of this year) would seem to qualify as, if not rousing successes, certainly not failures either. Dude's a Moguls workhorse ... at least until you look at his films' User Ratings. I mean, wow. MFR's current rating is 3.6, and DLG's is a miserable 3.1. And this seems to bear out a very disturbing trend in IMDb's User Ratings when it comes to "African-American" movies. For example: Are We There Yet? is 4.2, but made $82 million in 2005, and its sequel, Are We Done Yet? pulled in nearly $50 million despite its even more wretched rating of 2.6. Stomp the Yard had a tremendous opening weekend of $25 million despite opening in the frozen wasteland of January, but only managed a rating of 3.1. Norbit nearly cracked $100 million, but its rating was a mere 3.6. Even I Think I Love My Wife, by all accounts a well-written, thoughtfully-acted film featuring respected comic Chris Rock, scooched by with only a 5.6. There are many more examples, but I think you get my point.
Now, far be it for me to poo-poo IMDb's system, but methinks something is a mite fishy in this department. Yes, the overall quality of many of the films listed above is undoubtedly in question, but I can't help but wonder if there might be something else going on. What all this means to you, as a Moguls player is this: pick this film at your own risk, which is very high. Given this week's fairly weak schedule, Why Did I Get Married? could very well end up netting some Top 5 points, and perhaps as many as $30 million before all is said and done. But I would be very surprised if this particular film broke the drought currently being suffered by inarguably "black" movies, which is a shame because ... how long will it be before drought becomes precedent?
In the small town of Norway, Iowa, baseball is the local religion, so much so that the local high school team was able to take the state championship in 19 of 23 years. However, the townsfolk are shocked when the state government decides to merge Norway High with a larger school, effective after the current season ("current" being in 1991). The question is: can the son of the beloved long-time coach rally his team for an unprecedented 20th championship? Such is the true story told in The Final Season, starring Lord of the Rings alum Sean Astin as Kent Stock, who puts his life on hold to fulfill his father's (and his community's) legacy.
It's not often that I critique a movie without having seen the trailer, but I'm afraid that's the case here, as I have been unable to find one for this film (one that's compatible with my computer's antiquated operating system, anyway ... phooey), so all I have to go on is what's on paper. Season was fairly well-received at the Tribeca Film Festival in late April, and the impression I get from reading reviews is that it is an upbeat, feel-good sort of movie, with some solid performances by Astin as well as cast members Tom Arnold, Powers Boothe and Rachael Leigh Cook.
Uplifting sports movies are always a fun watch, but this film has all the makings of a "wait until DVD" film. Never mind that there have been so many "inspirational" sports films in the last few years, the total lack of hype tells me that this title, good intentions aside, will disappear quietly into the night ... unless you live in Norway, Iowa, where this film will probably become the No. 1 movie of all time. (Of course, before you get excited, remember that this is a town with all of 600 or so residents.) $2 in Ultimate and $3 in Box Office is all it will cost you, but then, nothing priced this low is going to bring you big bucks anyway.
Last, and most certainly least, we have Rogue. Having already seen two "giant croc" films this year (Primeval and the Sci-Fi Channel's mega-lame Supergator, which I swear I only watched just to see what Kelly McGillis looks like these days), I think my threshold for crap like this has been more than met. This particular exercise in futility takes place in the land Down Under, and it stars Michael Vartan (no doubt seriously pining for his days on Alias) and Radha Mitchell (sporting the least convincing Aussie accent since Jim Carrey's in Dumb and Dumber).
As I did with The Nanny Diaries a few weeks ago, I'm going to dig into the annals and excavate a quote from our very own Nicodemus, who shared his thoughts about this film ... all the way back on March 22: "Exactly what makes Rogue deserving of a theatrical release, much less a wide release, beats the heck out of me. This flick will be death-rolled in a hurry; it's not even bad enough to be camp, much less good camp. If you're really, really in the mood for gripping entertainment about killer crocs, go rent Crocodile Dundee, or turn on something with the late, great Steve Irwin in it, or, hell, dig up Krocodylus. If that doesn't quell your Aussie craving, then pop in Finding Nemo, or The Dish, or watch an Outback Steak House commercial. Anything but this. Save yourself. I suppose it could make as much as $10 million at the box office; no other considerations are worth examining. Guppy."
Fantasy Moguls predicts no points, no points, terrible ratings, and not many bucks, but you already knew that, didn't you? Even as a bottom-feeder (heh), this title has tons of alternatives that are better; even, God help me, Goal 2: Living the Dream. Sheesh.
In Memoriam: When I was a kid growing up in the mid-70's, one of my favorite after-school TV programs was the old Match Game show. Granted, I didn't get a lot of the "adult" innuendo, but I thought that it was a lot of fun to watch, and the interplay between the contestants, Gene Rayburn (the Rod-Serling-meets-Ronald-Reagan host) and the six-member panel of celebrities which, from beginning to end, included Richard Dawson, Brett Somers and Charles Nelson Reilly. Brett and Charles always sat next to each other, and the way they played off of each other, hand to God, I really truly thought they were married. Their constant jibes and digs at each other had this eight-year-old in stitches on a daily basis. Brett, with her gravelly three-pack-a-day voice, and Charles, who looked like Steve Allen had really let himself go and had a voice like a gay carnival barker, sadly, both passed away recently. Charles on May 25, and Brett just last week (Sept. 15). I don't know if they're still re-running the old episodes on the Game Show Network, but if you have occasion, check it out, it really is classic TV at its classic-est.
Well, that about does it for this week. Please return one week hither, when I will shine a flashlight in the eyes of five more releases, set for the weekend of Oct. 19: Oscar hopeful Jake Gyllenhaal teams up with Oscar winners Reese Witherspoon, Alan Arkin and Meryl Streep for post-9/11 drama Rendition; Halle Berry pairs up with fellow Oscar-winner Benicio Del Toro for Things We Lost in the Fire; Ben Affleck ("No!") steps back behind the camera ("Oh, okay, whew") to direct Oscar-winners (boy, a lot of them this week) Morgan Freeman and Ed Harris in Gone Baby Gone; Josh Hartnett defends a small Alaska town from a horde of vampires (who may or have not won any Oscars) in 30 Days of Night; and inspirational sports movies are spoofed into a bloody pulp in The Comebacks, which ... may involve the eating of Oscar Meyer wieners, I don't know.
TTFN!
For the love of Martha Washington, don't make the same mistake that Shrykespeare did! Get in touch with him at shrykespeare@gmail.com and he'll tell you how Kelly McGillis is looking these days. Knock a second time if he doesn't seem to hear you at first; that's Berlin's "Take My Breath Away" that's blastin' in his headphones.


We Own the Night has a 8.5 score in IMDB after 400 votes- not a bad start. I think it'll make it to 2nd place on its weekend, and maybe sneak into the following weekend.
I'm concerned about Dan in Real Life. Have you seen the trailer? Mediocre middle-aged rom-com stuff. It wishes it were Sideways.
Plus, filmjerk is saying a 1500 or so theatre opening- not a great count for Top 5 or PTA points.
Just a thought.
Posted by: numbersix_99 | September 25, 2007 at 09:04 AM
Shryke, any thoughts on Lars and the Real Girl, which opens that same weekend?
Posted by: la_resistance28 | September 25, 2007 at 10:31 AM
Actually, Greg McLean, the genius behind the excellent "Wolf Creek", is the man directing "Rogue", so I wouldn't give up on that flick quite yet. In any case, unlike you, I have a strong "threshold for crap," which is how I finished your article.
Posted by: recks | September 25, 2007 at 10:40 AM
Owch, Shryke, you've just been zinged by Recks.
All I can say is that I'd read Shryke's article 10 times over before watching the unimaginative Wolf Creek again
Posted by: numbersix_99 | September 25, 2007 at 11:12 AM
why did i get married is going to top the boxoffice. Perry has a huge fanbase and this movie is best of of one his best selling plays. No way we own the night or the golden age top that weekend. Perry films alway make it to the top.
Posted by: curtis | September 25, 2007 at 01:27 PM
i agree, why did i get married will take the top spot. Perry fanbase will show up. We own the night might make around what shooter did. The golden age will be lucky to make 10 million. Perry will win the weekend.
Posted by: star wars geek | September 25, 2007 at 01:43 PM
like Little Girls, which opened at Number 5? Sure, Family Reunion opened at the top, but on one of the dullest opening weekends ever. It'll open at Number 3 at the most (after We Own and Heartbreak Kid)
Posted by: numbersix_99 | September 25, 2007 at 02:42 PM
i putting my money on Why did i get married. We own the night will not win.
Posted by: kevin20 | September 25, 2007 at 02:53 PM
I did not know much about perry. But i do know that evertime one of his film comes out. Theaters sell out. Plus the trailer got a great reaction in frount of The Kingdom. I just do not see Golden age or We own the night out doing perry. But we will see.
Posted by: Tom Who | September 25, 2007 at 03:01 PM
The only reason why Daddy's little girls did not do as big as tyler perry's first two film is because of two reason. First the film was not based on a tyler perry play, so his fans did not know much about the film. Secound tyler perry himself was not in the film. Why did i get married seems two based off one one of perry's best selling play's. Plus perry himself is in the film. I agree that it will be number 1 or 2.
As for the other two films. Not feeling much live for We own the night. it looks like another the Departed. Plus buzz is not the good for the film. I seeing a 10 million weekend. the Golden age went from being a big oscar contender to a meh film in about 3 days. Not seeing much love other then the art house people.
The heartbreack kid or Why Did i Get married will be number one oct 12.
What is really going to help Why did i get married is that there has not been a movie for the urban crowd all summer. Talk to me never came out wide thanks to Focus.
Posted by: filmboy | September 25, 2007 at 03:21 PM
Well i will be seeing We own the night that weekend but I pretty much agree. i like some of perry work but I am not fan. His new movie seems like his best to date and janet jackson will get more people.
Posted by: RoadRunner | September 25, 2007 at 04:44 PM
Wow, this has got to be a record number of responses.
You all make good points about Tyler Perry. There's no doubt that the man knows his craft and also knows how to play to a wide audience. I have no doubt that WDIGM will do well, but the numbers speak for themselves. I'd be surprised if this movie's User Rating was over 6.0... and if it is, I'll actually be quite happy, for reasons that should be obvious. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but doesn't it seem like most films where the majority of the cast are African-Americans have low ratings? Yes, "Talk to Me" got a great score, but it wasn't widely released (more's the pity). Not that I think that "Norbit" or "Are We There Yet?" were worthy of good scores, far from it, but I think that many people who vote on IMDb do so without seeing the film. And their vote is "1".
And recks? Even I get tired of reading my own crap from time to time. You go enjoy "Rogue". I'm sure there will be plenty of seats available.
Posted by: Shrykespeare | September 25, 2007 at 08:48 PM
ohhhhhh....zing-back yo!!!! you gonna take that recks?? :D
though to be fair, you DID get all up in shryke's grille dawg.... :D
lol....
Posted by: ashish | September 25, 2007 at 09:49 PM
That's cool, Shryke. Hey, how about this? How about you not see "Rogue" and then write about how awful it is? I'm sure that'd make for a really interesting article.
Posted by: recks | September 26, 2007 at 05:04 AM
Re Rogue - Radha Mitchell IS Australian.... so your comment about "least convincing accent" is rather off.
Also, don't tar Rogue with the same brush as those other crap croc flicks - it's actually very good.
Posted by: Sebastian | September 26, 2007 at 07:08 AM
Okay, fine, you got me. It's not right for me to call films "crap" if I haven't seen them. All I can do is speak from experience, and I have seen at least a dozen "giant croc" films in my life, and they, for the most part have been, well, crap. So I don't think I'm totally out of line by jumping the gun a little. I don't think anyone would begrudge me too much if I called "Daddy Day Camp" or "Captivity" or "I Know Who Killed Me" crap ahead of time, based on the, you know, overwhelming evidence to suggest it.
Sebastien, please enlighten me as to why Rogue is "actually quite good", and what sets it apart from other film with a "giant animal preying on luckless tourists, explorers and/or scienteists" theme. I mean, you'd really be hard-pressed to convince me that stories like that DON'T follow pretty much the same pattern. Yes, perhaps the effects, the convincing-ness of the croc in Rogue is better than in your lame-ass Sci-Fi Channel movie of the week, but you can only see so many movies JUST LIKE THIS before you can only throw up your hands and say "whatever". I saw "Primeval" in January, and to its credit, it was actually quite scary in parts, but not nearly enough for me to call it "good".
Posted by: Shrykespeare | September 26, 2007 at 07:23 AM
Plus, the fact that Rogue has been postponed no less than three times tells me something, and that something ain't good.
And let me take this opportunity to apologize to any Radha Mitchell fans (or, for that manner, Radha herself). I was unaware that she was an Aussie, as I have seen her in plenty of films where she was able to convincingly hide her native accent. It's just that the accent that I heard her employ in the trailer SOUNDED incredibly fake to me. My bad. (Sheepish grin.)
Posted by: Shrykespeare | September 26, 2007 at 07:27 AM
Good points about IMDB scores and movies with African-American casts. Look at the low imdb scores of movies like Roll Bounce and ATL, and Pride, movies which did fairly well with critics but have very low imdb scores. Something fishy there.
Posted by: martindale | September 26, 2007 at 02:01 PM
Oh my Holy God. Hold on to your hats, folks.
Rogue has been bumped AGAIN. This makes FOUR freakin' times now. According to Box Office Mojo, it's new release date is "Winter 2008". Whether that means January or December 2008, who effin' knows.
Unbelievable. Just release the frickin' thing to DVD and have done with it!
Posted by: Shrykespeare | September 26, 2007 at 10:27 PM
Sure, happy to reply re Rogue.
I'm Australian, and saw Rogue recently as part of a series of preview screenings here in Sydney.
it is a darn good thriller, with exciting heart-pumping, fist-in-your-mouth action plus awesome effects and scenery. I reckon Americans will absolutely love it.
Primeval was, by comparison, absolute rubbish.
Posted by: Sebastian | September 27, 2007 at 01:01 AM
LMAO, what the hell is "fist-in-your-mouth action"?
That doesn't even sound enjoyable.
Posted by: BanksIsDaFuture | September 28, 2007 at 11:55 AM
Crocs to the left of him, crocs to the right.. another oz croc movie is stalking Rogue.. Black Water! Just scored best direction and cinematography at an advance screening Melbourne Underground Film Fest. Jeez if someone's actually made a GOOD croc movie its a sure sign of the end of days.
Posted by: bill | October 07, 2007 at 03:24 AM